Welcome to the current issue

feb cover

In the current issue

Are YOU A Neoconservative?
If one had to choose a word to describe neoconservatism,...
Roses:
Gift of the Angels for Gentle Healing Roses have seduced people...
Leaks and Landscape During a Dry Winter
Did you know that most water customers start off the...
Loading feeds...

Created by SopanTech Solutions

Thom Hartmann

The nation's #1 progressive radio talk show host and the New York Times bestselling, 4-times Project Censored winning author of 21 books in print. In its eighth year, The Thom Hartmann Program  airs live daily, NOON – 3pm, ET simulcast as both radio and TV on over 120 radio stations. into more than 50 million homes via both nationwide satellite TV systems (DirecTV and Dish Network). http://www.thomhartmann.com

RE-COGNIZE, RE-THINK, RE-IMAGINE

Bioneers speaker asks: “What if every act of design and construction made the world a better place?”

Jason F. McLennan, CEO of the International Living Future Institute and author of  Zugunruhe, appeared at The Central Coast Bioneers Conference in San Luis Obispo on Oct. 14. McLennan’s presentation, which included an impressive stage set and imagery, was extended for more than an hour at the request of attendees. Simply put, after McLennan had wrapped up, said goodnight, and was leaving the podium, the audience wouldn’t budge.
Halfway down the stairs, he appeared puzzled, hesitated, and then returned to the microphone, asking “Do you have some questions, or –?”
“Yes!” was the enthusiastic response.

Read more...

Creek & Central Coast Cleanup

Community volunteers have the opportunity to take ownership of their neighborhoods, parks, beaches, and open spaces in the County of San Luis Obispo on Saturday, September 17th by cleaning local creeks, beaches, the river, and other waterways from 9am to noon. Volunteers can check in at a station near where they live or work at 9am. They will be directed to sites in need located in their area.

Visit www.CreekDay.org or www.Coast4u.org for details.

Read more...

Sept Water Conservation Tips

September brings cooler evenings that allow reducing summer irrigation schedules by about 25 percent, as well as reducing your water bill. It is also time to begin planning any modifications to your landscape. If you intend to plant or re-seed a small lawn or add other landscape plants, consider doing it at either the end of September or the beginning of October. The cooler evenings will require less water, and winter rains will soon take over to further establish the new landscape.

Natives can be added to the garden as well. The natives should be watered well while planting, but only occasionally thereafter until the rains start. Most natives will do best with limited watering during the first summer season that follows; perhaps one deep watering per month. After that first summer, many natives will do best with no supplemental watering!

Regardless of what kind of plants you are using, it is important to not expose the roots to dry soil while planting. Roots are covered with nearly microscopic “hairs” that take up water. If they contact dry soil, or are allowed to dry out during the planting process, they can be damaged and cause the plant to wilt. To remedy this, place some water in the planting hole and in the pot before removing the plant from the pot. When the plant is in the ground, water it well and you are on your way!

Bob Nicholson has a degree in Natural Resources Management from Cal Poly, SLO, with over 20 years experience in water conservation, irrigation consultation and leak detection. Bob is available for residential and commercial consultation. Call him evenings and weekends at 805-440-6977 and ask about his services.

Debt-for-Nature Swaps

 EarthTalk®
E - The Environmental Magazine
Dear EarthTalk: As I understand it, “Debt-for-Nature Swaps” are arrangements by which countries can erase debt by preserving land. Are any being done today?
-- Bill Hunt, Topeka, KS

The debt-for-nature swap concept, whereby a portion of a developing nation’s foreign debt is forgiven in exchange for local investments in environmental conservation measures, dates back to the mid-1980s when Thomas Lovejoy of the non-profit World Wildlife Fund (WWF) first proposed it as a way to deal with the problems of developing nations’ indebtedness and the negative consequences for their natural resources and diverse environments.

The theory goes that if a country with, say, valuable tropical rainforests, is up to its ears in debt, it will sell off or otherwise deplete those natural resources, instead of protecting or conserving them, in order to raise the money needed to pay off its debts. Debt-for-nature swaps can therefore be useful financial mechanisms for helping countries reduce debt without destroying their most valuable natural resources.

Since the first swap was brokered with Bolivia (to protect its Beni Biosphere Reserve and adjacent areas) by the non-profit Conservation International in 1987, many national governments and conservation groups have engaged in similar types of debt-for-nature swap negotiations, especially in tropical countries which contain diverse and threatened species of flora and fauna. Costa Rica has exchanged tens of millions of dollars in debt to protect some of its most pristine and biologically productive rainforests.

In 1998 the U.S. government passed the Tropical Forest Conservation Act to codify debt-for-nature swaps, including formally welcoming non-profit groups like Conservation International, the Nature Conservancy, WWF and others to help arrange the deals and oversee implementation of local initiatives. A 2010 Congressional Research Service report found that since 1987, debt-for-nature swaps have channeled upwards of $1 billion toward tropical forest conservation initiatives instead of back into creditor nations’ coffers.

But far fewer deals are occurring today for a number of reasons. For one, says the Congressional Research Service, other agreements for debt restructuring and cancellation have reduced developing nations’ debt by significantly more than debt-for-nature swaps can. Another is that the concept has fallen somewhat out of favor. Some experts argue that the financial benefits are overstated, that funds are misdirected to less needy countries, that external debt is not a primary driver of deforestation and other environmental ills, and that funding does not necessarily equate to effective implementation of conservation strategies.

Criticism aside, some deals are still getting done. In 2008, France forgave $20 million in debt owed by Madagascar to help the biodiversity-rich nation triple the size of its protected areas to better protect its native flora and fauna. In 2010, the U.S. forgave $21 million in Brazilian debt to fund several ecosystem protection initiatives in Brazil’s still vanishing tropical rainforests. The U.S. has also forgiven debt from the Philippines, Guatemala and Peru in recent years in exchange for on-the-ground conservation efforts. Germany and the Netherlands have each forgiven some of their foreign debt to tropical nations for forest protection as well. So while debt-for-nature swaps are not as popular as they once were, they are still a key tool in the toolbox of environmentalists looking to promote conservation in tropical countries.

CONTACTS: WWF, www.wwf.org; Conservation International, www.conservation.org
The Nature Conservancy, www.nature.org.

EarthTalk® is written and edited by Roddy Scheer and Doug Moss and is a registered trademark of E - The Environmental Magazine (www.emagazine.com). Send questions to: This e-mail address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it . Subscribe: www.emagazine.com/subscribe. Free Trial Issue: www.emagazine.com/trial.

Water Tips -

During the summer it is important to watch your landscape closely. As you adjust for water needs, keep in mind that water requirements for Citrus can be more intensive, while most stone fruits have been harvested and may have reduced water needs.  

Potted plants are seldom addressed when discussing water conservation. An important factor is the type of container used. Rough, red clay containers are a low fire clay that is permeable – water tends to evaporate through the sides of the pot. Glazed pots and plastic pots shouldn’t have that problem.  

I had a customer turn up the irrigation to her pots because the very tips of her leaves were turning brown. She thought they needed more water, but that was not exactly the problem. Brown leaf tips; particularly in house or potted plants, are often indicative of salt burn from accumulated minerals or fertilizer in the soil.  

Of course, other things such as freezing, or suddenly exposing a plant to unusual amounts of sun, can cause leaf “burn”. But all things being equal, if the problem is only with the leaf tip, the accumulation of salts is a likely cause. During the watering process some of the moisture evaporates from the soil and minerals that are left behind accumulate in the soil. These minerals (or salts) can be taken up into the plant and reach levels that “burn” the leaf tip. The solution is to make sure that enough water leaches through and out the bottom of the pot (do this two or three times).  This leaching will help wash the accumulating salts out of the soil and help prevent future salt burn.  The solution to salt burn is not necessarily watering more but watering wisely.

August can be a scorcher; it’s the last month for summer irrigation scheduling. Even though September can be warm, the cooler evenings will allow you to begin reducing your irrigation. The August schedule is the same as during July, so hold steady on the irrigation for another month. It’s important to hold steady because for some reason water consumption tends to increase during August-October.
One thing you can do during August is check again for missing drip emitters or other damage to your system. This is easily done by quickly walking through the landscape while the system is running; any problems should be immediately noticeable. Remember that one missing drip emitter can increase the consumption on a station by as much as 1/3. By finding and repairing problems, perhaps you can avoid the increase in consumption that seems to be typical for this time of year.

Some Comments

 on Green vs. Green
Despite editorials, commentaries, and letters to the editor regarding the advantages/disadvantages of two industrial solar projects on the Carrizo Plain, readers of local print media like New Times and The Tribune have not been given a comprehensive overview of the solar debate occurring in the western U.S. – the so-called “green vs. green” dispute between alternative energy advocates and those who wish to protect wildlife habitat.

Here in SLO County, that debate was on view when Jay Salter, long-time fellow activist and labor union supporter, challenged my “Viewpoint” article in The Tribune (February 22, 2011) with a Viewpoint entitled “Old activists should not be elitists” on March 6th. He reminded us that the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) “was drawn up during the state’s halcyon years... in our happier past, before climate change was acknowledged as a real threat to the world....” Salter implied that this 1970 act is outdated and doesn’t meet today’s needs.

I believe environmental laws were not written only for the 1970s. The same edition of The Tribune in which Salter made that suggestion also carried these headlines: “75 percent of world’s coral reefs threatened by human activity;” “Scientists predict that lodgepole pine...will be largely gone by 2080 due to warming climate;”; and “Eastern cougar called extinct.” To me, these concurrent assaults on Earth’s ecosystems indicate that laws like CEQA are needed more than ever and ought to be obeyed and strengthened wherever possible. The Carrizo Plain is a cauldron of biodiversity, with at least 240 plant and animal species, 90 of which are endangered, threatened, or of special concern. Ignoring significant environmental impacts through cunning wordplay is hardly a viable strategy for a much needed sustainable future!

Jay Salter admonished me and my friends to “descend from our lonely ivory towers and begin making smart energy policy...and accept the political and economic realities we face here, now....” He appeals for support for “smart energy policy” and suggests that we “graying environmentalists” should be “prepared to follow heartfelt words and passions with meaningful solutions.”

Okay, Jay, let’s do that.

Promoting clean energy is one way to reduce greenhouse gas emissions, but not the only way. I believe what is “smart” and what we need to start rebuilding local economies and communities is to disconnect from big energy and big money. Favor less centralization and more localization; build local small- to mid-scale electric plants keeping money and jobs local! Every planning department should first ask each new applicant: “Will your project be energy self-sufficient? If so, when; if not, why?”

What we need most is distributed solar, i.e., locally generated, both commercial and residential. We easily could accomplish this in SLO County. Renewable energy produced locally for local consumption is not grid-oriented. Planned properly, construction and maintenance jobs will stay local; so will the money. Projects will involve less acreage, fewer significant impacts, and can be – and are being --built faster and cheaper than utility-scale (less bureaucracy). Fresno County has 12 solar projects ranging from 2 to 20 MW capacity in various stages of planning or construction. All power will be produced and used locally for agriculture and other businesses.

I‘d like to leave you with this thought from Joan Didion:
"California is a place in which a boom mentality and a sense of Chekhovian loss meet in uneasy suspension; in which the mind is troubled by some buried but ineradicable suspicion that things better work here, because here, beneath the immense bleached sky, is where we run out of continent.”
~Joan Didion, "Notes from a Native Daughter," Slouching Towards Bethlehem

So Jay, here’s my proposal: Let’s you and I ask our Board of Supervisors to please make it our Number One Energy Goal to be the first county in the State of California to reach carbon neutral status and keep the energy boom money in San Luis Obispo County.