Flu, Fear and Finance
Did you notice that the 2009 “flu season” never ended? We were inundated by the media and government with warnings of a Swine Flu “pandemic” that never materialized. This year we’re being told to get your flu shots, again, and “fortunately,” you will only need one because it also contains H1N1
According to data from the Centers for Disease Control, during the 2006-07 flu season 60 percent of health care professionals declined to get a flu shot. Shouldn’t what’s good for the goose be good for the gander?
Why the push? According to Glen Nowak, Ph.D., Associate Director for Communications of the CDC’s National Immunization Program, the best “recipe” for a successful influenza season is for “medical experts and public health authorities to publicly (e.g., via media) state concern and alarm (and predict dire outcomes)–and urge influenza vaccination.” This should produce “significant media interest and attention” and “framing of the flu season in terms that motivate behavior (e.g., as ‘very severe,’ ‘more severe than last or past years,’ ‘deadly’).” [1] Prime example of the type of fear-mongering, use of the media and manipulation of the general public that goes on in the CDC.
Look at who’s making the recommendations in the first place. In August 1999, the U.S. House of Representatives Committee on Government Reform initiated an investigation into federal vaccine policy that focused on possible conflicts of interest on the part of federal policy-makers. The committee released a report focusing on two influential advisory committees utilized by federal regulators to provide expert advice on vaccine policy: the FDA’s Vaccines and Related Biological Products Advisory Committee (VRBPAC) and the CDC’s Advisory Committee on Immunizations Practices (ACIP). The VRBPAC advises the FDA on the licensing of new vaccines, and the ACIP advises the CDC on guidelines to be issued to doctors and the states for the appropriate use of vaccines.
Members of the advisory committees are required to disclose any financial conflicts of interest and recluse themselves from participating in decisions in which they have an interest. The committee’s investigation determined that conflict of interest rules employed by the FDA and the CDC have been weak, enforcement has been lax, and advisory committee members with substantial ties to pharmaceutical companies have been given waivers to participate in committee proceedings. [2]
Among the specific problems identified in the House committee staff report: The CDC routinely grants waivers from conflict of interest rules to every member of its advisory committee. The chairman of the CDC’s advisory committee owned 600 shares of stock in Merck, a pharmaceutical company with an active vaccine division. Members of the CDC’s advisory committee often fill out incomplete financial disclosure statements, and are not required to provide the missing information by CDC ethics officials. Four out of eight CDC advisory committee members who voted to approve guidelines for the rotavirus vaccine in June 1998 had financial ties to pharmaceutical companies that were developing different versions of the vaccine. Three out of five FDA advisory committee members who voted to approve the rotavirus vaccine in December 1997 had financial ties to pharmaceutical companies that were developing different versions of the vaccine. [2]
Conflicts of interest abound in both the FDA and CDC and there is an open door between the pharmaceutical corporations and these organizations, meaning researchers and consultants often go back and forth between working for the pharmaceutical industry and the CDC and FDA.
According to the 2003 Chiron annual report, the company made $332.4 million in sales on flu vaccine alone and had a 53% gross profit. Perhaps this has something to do with increasing media attention, commercials and recommendations for everyone age 6 months old and older to receive a flu vaccine.
Does the vaccine even work?. An independent analysis of vaccine studies by the internationally renowned Cochrane Collaboration, published in the British Medical Journal in 2006, concluded that there is little scientific proof that the influenza vaccine is safe or effective for children and adults. The report concluded that too few clinical trials have been conducted to prove vaccine safety, and current evidence indicates that use of the vaccine in children under 2 years had the same efficacy as placebo. In healthy people under 65, vaccination did not affect hospital stay, time off work, or death from influenza and its complications. [3]
Tom Jefferson, MD, and colleagues at the Cochrane Collaboration, also wrote to The Lancet reporting that the safety of influenza vaccines given to babies and children is unknown. Incredibly, most of the trials they reviewed were not designed to assess serious adverse reactions. Given that the CDC currently recommends flu vaccines for all healthy children older than 6 months, this news is extremely disturbing.
A 2006 study done in Ontario to determine whether the incidence of influenza there decreased following the introduction of their Universal Influenza Immunization Campaign (UIIC) in 2000 found that there has not been a decrease in the mean monthly influenza rate following the introduction of their campaign. The scientists who did the study concluded in their research paper stated, “Despite increased vaccine distribution and financial resources towards promotion, the incidence of influenza in Ontario has not decreased following the introduction of the UIIC.” [4]
If that weren’t enough reason to avoid the flu vaccine, influenza virus strains mutate, necessitating a new vaccine each year. Every year, the World Health Organization predicts which strains of the virus are most likely to be circulating the following year so vaccine manufacturers can produce vaccines for administration that fall. In the 1994-1995 flu season, the CDC reported that 43% of isolated influenza samples for the predominant virus were not similar to that in the vaccine. Likewise, for another virus 87% of samples were not similar to that in the vaccine. For yet another, 76% of isolated samples were not similar to that in the vaccine. [9] During the 1992-1993 flu season 84% of the isolated influenza samples for the predominant virus were not similar to that in the vaccine. [5]
Although influenza is associated with more disease, hospitalization, and death in "at risk" populations, no adequate controlled studies exist which prove that influenza vaccine reduces the incidence of influenza in these groups. [6]
On the CDC’s web site main flu page they claim the flu is responsible for 36,000 deaths per year. [7] However, the CDC’s more comprehensive National Vital Statistics Report states that only 257 people died of the flu in 2001 and 753 in 2002. [8]
In another study published in The Lancet in 2007, the researchers questioned flu shots for the elderly stating that the benefits are “greatly exaggerated.” The researchers stated that the public policy for the elderly getting flu shots is based on flimsy, even nonexistent, evidence. [9]
With little proof of effectiveness and safety, questionable marketing techniques and rampant conflicts of interest between vaccine policy makers and pharmaceutical companies bringing in millions of taxpayers money, perhaps it's time to rethink the perceived need for a flu vaccine this year or in the future.
What can you do to avoid the flu? Remember first that what ever you try to avoid you tend to attract. You must instead focus on increasing your health so that you are not susceptible to germs in the first place.
The National Vaccine Information Center (NVIC) gives the following alternative strategies for dealing with the flu…
? If you have the flu, stay home until you are well
? If you know a person sick with the flu, avoid contact until they are well
? Wash your hands frequently
? Drink plenty of fluids, especially water
? Get adequate rest
? Eat a wholesome diet rich in vitamins and minerals, especially foods containing vitamin D (such as cod liver oil)
? Spend a few minutes a day in sunlight to help your body make and store vitamin D.
? Consider chiropractic adjustments, homeopathic remedies and other natural options for healing and maintaining health.
? Exercise regularly when you are well.
? Lower stress through meditation and other healthy lifestyle changes.
Dr. Steve Tullius, D.C. practices in Grover Beach where his focus is on creating a healthier future by empowering and educating his practice members to become stewards of their health.